The lawsuit become filed by way of Monica G. , a woman from Mississippi who turned into injured by way of the choice™ elite retrievable inferior Vena-Cava (“IVC Filter”) manufactured through argon clinical gadgets inc. and Rex scientific gadgets, l.p.
The option IVC Filter out became implanted in her body on October 18, 2013 for the prevention of pulmonary emboli and deep vein thrombosis by Dr. Jeffery Howard at north Mississippi scientific middle in Tupelo, MS.
On November three, 2016, she underwent an unsuccessful procedure to remove the choice IVC Filter. at some point of the attempt, it turned into found that the hook of the filter was embedded inside the wall of the Vena Cava.
Furthermore, the choice IVC Filter was also tilted and several cord legs (referred to as “struts”) of the filter have been perforating the vena cava.
On April 20, 2017, she underwent a second unsuccessful retrieval method. once more, the choice ivc filter out could not be removed as it turned into embedded, tilted, and puncturing the vein.
On may additionally 12, 2017, she underwent a third retrieval technique which proved a hit. surgeons confirmed that numerous struts were protruding through the wall of her vein.
At some point of those 3 surgical methods, she suffered physical pain and anxiety approximately whether or not the clear out may be retrieved and if she could suffer further pain and headaches due to the defective filter out. consistent with the complaint:
Attorneys say the safety and effectiveness of the choice IVC Filter out changed into now not competently tested and has no longer been installed by means of Rex clinical. the manufacturers are accused of downplaying safety dangers and promoting a dangerously defective clinical tool.
The lawsuit become filed on June 20, 2017 inside the Philadelphia county court of common pleas — case id: 170602033.
There are now 4,000 other IVC Filter out proceedings pending in opposition to Rex medical, argon medical, prepare dinner medical, c.r. bard, and different manufacturers in kingdom and federal courts nationwide.
The plaintiff is represented with the aid of legal professional Ben c. martin of the regulation workplaces of Ben c. martin in Dallas, Texas; and legal professional Stephen a. sheller of sheller, p.c., in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.